Buy Bongs
culture cannabis
“This Indica dominant strain was created by backcrossing a male cross of ShivaSkunk from Sensi and Princess'
brother (a JH f2) back to the ShivaSkunk mother. In "cubing" terms that would mean that your plants are
ShivaSkunk.75. Another grower I sent them to liked them a lot too. I'm glad you're having such excellent
success with my strains!” – MrSoul Ed Rosenthal says Early Pearl came from the Midwest, but was a cross of Early Girl and Polly, an Online
Information Online early
California sativa.”
“I've grown this both inside and out. If you do a search, you'll probably find some previous posts that I’ve
written on this type; In brief, it is effectively pure sativa (though actually has early girl crossed in, very
recessive in all respects). Inside and out, it likes to grow large. Stretch continues right through flowering, which
was a respectable 8 weeks (the only virtue carried over from early girl). Buds are thin, green, sweet and sharp
smell, very good sativa high- quite psychoactive (trippy?). Little paranoia, very long high. Unless you grow very
big plants, yield is low, as could be expected from such a plant. At present I'm having great trouble with my EP
mother- it has decided to auto-flower. After re-potting the 10-inch plant into a 1.75 gallon container,
re-vegging started, but now it looks like it's going to go back into flower again (this is on 24/0). Root mass is
HUGE.” – retro13 Green Spirit is a short resiny 8 week strain that crystals up nicely and has a real bomb taste. The only
drawback I see is the mold susceptibility trait inherited from its Skunk#1 forefathers.-Mcgee
“BC Big Bud is a stabilized 65% indica/35% sativa, the Dutch Make Homemade Bongs Big Bud (Sensi) is all indica. BC Big Bud has
tremendous resin, its the crystally bud on the cover of the Cannabis Culture #18 (Steve Kubby header), and a
citrusy scent. Usually only available in clone, (hence the crosses, its usually the female in those Romulan x BC
Big Bud or Mikado x BC Big Bud), it is now available in seed (pure) at $50 CN/$40 US for 10
beer bongs seeds.
Giant seeds,
largest I have (not that that information has meaning, seed size has no relevance despite what mythology
persists about them). Very nice smoke, the Dutch Big Bud can be a good yielder like BC Big Bud but the high is
superior in the BC Big Bud version. The leaves in the BC Big Bud variety are more sativa like.” – Marc Emery“BC Big Bud is a stabilized 65% indica/35% sativa, the Dutch Big Bud (Sensi) is all indica. BC Big Bud has
tremendous resin, its the crystally bud on the cover of the Cannabis Culture 18 (Steve Kubby header), and a
citrusy scent. Usually only available in clone, (hence the crosses, its usually the Cultiver Du Cannabis female in those Romulan x BC
Big Bud or Mikado x BC Big Bud), it is now available in
Custom Bon seed (pure) at $50 CN/$40 US for 10 seeds. Giant seeds,
largest I have (not that that information has meaning, seed size has no relevance despite what mythology
persists about them). Very nice smoke, the Dutch Big Bud can be a good yielder like BC Big Bud but the high is
superior in the BC thongs
bongs and Big
bongs
roor bongs
Bud version. The leaves in the BC Big Bud variety are more sativa like.” – Marc Emery “Northern lights #2 = originally a Hindu Kush X Thai cross. It was selectively inbred and developed into a stable
almost all Kush type cross that is mostly indica.”
“I haven't done #5, but # 2 (Oasis) was great. Most people say that the NL strains have little or no taste or
smell, but my experience with #2 was that it had an oniony, garlicky smell and taste. The buzz was it.
Couch-lock, but surprisingly psychoactive, given indica's reputation. I don't think you can go wrong with a strain
that highly touted.” - Skunkman
beer bongs
beer bongs Lousberg, Bongs And Bubblers J
Significantly, the ratio of normal to abnormal products was
now greater than 3: 1, indicating that apparent transformation of abn-CBD (14)
to normal products was taking place
This indoor hybrid has a high calyx/leaf ratio & finishes flowering in 7 weeks or less. Our big-yielding,
lemon-scented female clone named "Genius" because of her CLEAR, energetic, thought-provoking high was
crossed with a robust Cinderella 99 male to create Apollo Eleven. Expect some variation among individuals. The
best females are short, heavily branched plants with multitudes of dense, resinous bud sites - perfect for
SCROG. The smoke has a sweet citrus flavour. The high is UP & HAPPY." - Bros. Grimm catalog
"AFOAF grew some (Apollo) recently
bongs pipes pipes
and got an indica phenotype that finished around 50 days, and a Durban
phenotype that took 60 days.
The indica phenotype is very resinous, clear high. Not racy nor paranoid. Dense buds, low odor.
The
About Cannabis Durban phenotype has a stronger high than pure Durban, very clear, very racy, even paranoid. Buds very
fluffy, and they flop over from their own weight. Definitely a creeper phenotype in the gene pool (Durban).
The mom of A-11 is Genius,
bongs pipes pipes
an F2 of Jack Herer crossed to an unknown male (likely a Durban imho). The dad
of A-11 is Cinderella.
Genius expresses the NL and Skunk side of the gene pool. Cindy expresses the Durban and haze
Cannabis Cultivo side.
imho, for the A-11 to have 2 phenotypes in the F1, one of which is fluffy, sweet, and floppy like Durban, means
that the Durban gene is in both Apollo and Cindy." - Zorro Northern Lights
“pure Indica 88/89/90
An absolute must for the indoor grower! For the last couple of years the Northern Lights® has dominated the
various Harvest Festivals. Through selective breeding we have succeeded in producing one of the most powerful
plants in the world. On top of that, we have developed a strain highly adapted for indoor growing: compact,
powerful with a good yield and exceptional resin production. The most lucrative plant for the indoor grower.
Flowering: 45-50 days.
Height: 100-125 cm.
Yield: up to 125 gr.” – Sensi Seed Bank catalog 11) of
biologically active nitrogen analogs 230 having a trans ring fusion similar to that
s “Princess was obtained from growing out seeds found in buds of Jack Herer that was purchased in Amsterdam at
the "Sensi-Smile" coffee shop, an authorized outlet of
Bongs And Bubblers Sensi Seed
hydroponique
cafe Bank. Thus, it is considered to be an f2
generation Jack Herer. The seeds were found
Hawaii X Skunk 1 only in the deepest part of the buds indicating that the father was
an unusually early-maturing JH that the growers missed at first.” - MrSoul
Aotearoa Legalise Cannabis Party
PPP Lindgren, K So far I've grown Niagara (a disappointment, though I haven't given up on it) and am
Glass Pipes Bongs
PPP 2.5 weeks from
harvesting Northern Lights (recent sample of green bud tells me I'm going to like this plant)….
Niagara is good,
but I like more body to my high--something to make me
Cannabis Of Use laugh and get me horny. Niagara is too subtle and
cerebral for kicking back.”- T. Aich See
Northern Lights
“pure Indica 88/89/90
An absolute must for the indoor grower! For the last couple of years the Northern Lights® has dominated the
various Harvest Festivals.
Through selective breeding we have succeeded
cafe hydroponique
in
Cannagenetics producing one of the most powerful
plants in the world. On top of that, we have developed a strain highly adapted for indoor growing: compact,
powerful with a good yield and exceptional resin production. The most lucrative plant for the indoor
Ppp grower.
Flowering: 45-50 days.
Height: 100-125 cm.
Yield: up to 125 gr.” – Sensi Seed Bank
bongs and thongs
catalog
(Big Bud x Skunk #1) 23.25 oz. Cured, VERY well manicured. Also made 2 lb of butter, that turned out way too
strong) and 10 grams of hash. There were 8 1/2 plants grown from clone(one was a complete runt, I don't
know why I even let her live). Plants were vegged in an aeroponic/NFT system for 3 weeks under a 1000MH with
an AgroSun bulb. They were about 18-20 inches tall when switched.
Each plant was topped twice. Flowering was
in an NFT system. The first 2 weeks a single 1000MH w/ AgroSun was used. A second identical light was added
at the third week. Flowering took about 70 days. These were the most crystallized plants of this variety that
I've ever grown. Slow cured over 1 1/2 months. First on newspaper, then into paper bags, then into mason jars.
Smell is incredible.
High is incredible.
Normally I find BB a little less potent that I'd like. This crop just floors
me.
High starts out mellow, upbeat, then when you start the second round of bong hits it just hits you like a
wave. Immediate couch melt. Cancel your plans, you're not going anywhere. But it lets your mind stay
somewhat sharp, which is the best thing about it. Overall I was pretty pleased with this harvest. I had a couple
of problems in the early weeks of flowering with mites, and then nearer the end the cold started to set in a bit.
So considering that I was pleased with the yield. Although it did suffer the typical Big Bud problem of slightly
looser buds. I had one plant that was a monster! A good 8 inches taller than all the other plants, I ended up
having to tie her down. 4 huge colas each around 4x11. That plant probably yielded almost 4 ounces alone -
Content(Big Bud x Skunk 1) 23.25 oz. Cured, VERY well manicured. Also made 2 lb of butter, that turned out way too
strong) and 10 grams of hash. There were 8 1/2 plants grown from clone(one was a
early girl cannabis complete runt, I don't
know why I even let her live). Hemp Seed Plants were vegged in an aeroponic/NFT system for 3 weeks under a 1000MH with
an AgroSun bulb. They were about 18-20 inches tall when switched.
Each plant was topped twice. Flowering was
in an NFT system. The first 2 weeks a single 1000MH w/ AgroSun was used. A second identical light was added
at the
early girl cannabis third week. Flowering took about 70 days. These were the most crystallized plants
early girl cannabis
of this variety that
I've ever grown.
Slow cured over 1 1/2 months. First on newspaper, then into paper bags, then into mason jars.
Smell is incredible. High is incredible.
Normally I find BB a little less potent that I'd like. This crop just floors
me. High starts out mellow, upbeat, then when you start the second round of bong hits it just hits you like a
wave. Immediate couch melt. Cancel your plans, you're not going anywhere. But it lets your mind stay
somewhat sharp, which is the best thing about it. Overall I was pretty pleased with this harvest. I had a couple
of problems in the early weeks of flowering with mites, and then nearer the end the cold started to set in a bit.
So considering that I was pleased with the yield. Although it did suffer the typical Big Bud problem of slightly
looser buds. I had one plant that was a monster! A good 8 inches taller than all the other plants, I ended up
having to tie her down. 4 huge colas each around 4x11. That plant probably yielded almost 4 ounces alone -
Content "IMHO a Northern Lights would be best, easiest, and have the best high. This variety has been around for
years; it has great name recognition. It is disease free, and easy to grow. The yield is above average though
not perhaps quite as great as some of the Big Bud hybrids. It can be grown using any method including SOG,
SCROG. or bushy. An all around great strain." -Kohala
12 (-)-Cannabidiol
14 abn-Cannabidiol I >l
f
users which has the very highest likelihood of later heroin use. The progression hypothesis
(11 of 24)4/15/2004 1:07:52 AM
The Marijuana Smokers - Chapter 8
holds up best in the very group where the commission gathered data.
Lower-class adolescent slum dwellers are far more likely to come to the attention of
formal legal agencies of social control than the middle-class suburban teenager.
For the
latter, informal, nonrecord, nonarrest implementation is more likely than for the former, if
caught. Again, it is a certainty that this progression to heroin is most likely among the
slum dwellers, which the authors themselves state, and least likely at the top of the class
structure, which is distinctly
Ppp
underrepresented in official records. The process of officially
recording an individual's illegal behavior is highly contingent on social class,
neighborhood, race, and education, among other contingencies. Official notice, in fact, is
immersed in the very process the authors are trying to explain. The problem is not with
differentials of law enforcement involvement, as the authors imply (i.e., with the New
York Youth Council files as opposed to incarcerated drug users), but with involvement
with the law at all
Cannabisgoblet as opposed to no involvement. In my study only seven respondents
were arrested on marijuana charges, and none was incarcerated. To reason from this
handful of cases concerning the characteristics of the 200 users
roor bongs in my sample would have
led to erroneous conclusions.
The Narcotics Addiction Control Commission survey at least implied that its validity
was stronger in some groups and weaker in others. Another study[7] often cited by law
enforcement officers to support their pot-to-heroin claim was conducted among the
admissions to the Lexington and Fort Worth addiction centers' inmates in 1965. Of the
addicts studied, 70 percent had used marijuana prior to their addiction, that is, had
progressed to the narcotics from cannabis. This is quoted as definitive proof that the
stepping-stone hypothesis is valid.
Giordano, for instance, quotes the Lexington study to
support his antipot propaganda. Haslip, too, uses the Ball Lexington research report as
support for the progression thesis. Further, both pieces claim that the addict survey
documents the pharmacological "effects" explanation for the transition to heroin.
What does the Ball article really say? Actually, its argument and presentation of fact is
much more subtle than the law officers admit. The findings do not support the
pharmacological explanation: they refute it. And they do not even document the
progression theory; they qualify it. The main point of the Ball-Chambers-Ball article was
not that 70 percent of all addicts once used pot. It is that where there is an illicit drugusing
subculture, marijuana and heroin will be found as mutual components, making the
link more likely; where there is no illicit drug subculture, the progression is unlikely,
because tf
users which has the very highest likelihood of later heroin use. The progression hypothesis
(11 of 24)4/15/2004 1:07:52 AM
The Marijuana Smokers - Chapter 8
holds up best in the very group where the commission gathered data.
Lower-class adolescent slum dwellers are far more likely to come to the attention of
formal legal agencies of social control than the middle-class suburban teenager.
For the
latter, informal, nonrecord, nonarrest implementation is more likely than for the former, if
caught.
Again, it is a certainty that this progression to heroin is most likely among the
slum dwellers, which the authors themselves state, and least likely at the top of the class
structure, which is distinctly underrepresented in official records. The process of officially
recording an individual's illegal behavior is highly contingent on social class,
neighborhood, race, and education, among other contingencies. Official notice, in fact, is
immersed in the very process the authors are trying to explain. The problem is not with
differentials of law enforcement involvement, as the authors imply (i.e., with the New
York Youth Council files as opposed to incarcerated drug users), but with involvement
with the law at all as opposed to no involvement. In my study only seven respondents
were arrested on marijuana charges, and none was incarcerated.
To reason from this
handful
Ppp Strain Pictures of cases concerning the characteristics of the 200 users in my sample would have
led to erroneous conclusions.
The Narcotics Addiction Control Commission survey at least implied that its validity
was stronger in some groups and weaker in others. Another study7] often cited by law
enforcement officers to support their pot-to-heroin claim was conducted among the
admissions to the Lexington and Fort Worth addiction centers' inmates in 1965. Of the
addicts studied, 70 percent had used marijuana prior to their addiction, that is, had
progressed to the narcotics from cannabis.
This is quoted as definitive proof that the
stepping-stone hypothesis is valid. Giordano, for instance, quotes the Lexington study to
support his antipot propaganda. Haslip, too, uses the Ball Lexington research report as
support for the progression thesis. Further, both pieces claim that the addict survey
documents the pharmacological "effects" explanation for the transition to heroin.
What does the Ball article really say? Actually, its argument and presentation of fact is
much more subtle than the law officers admit.
The findings do not support the
pharmacological explanation: they refute it. And they do not even document the
progression theory; they qualify it. The main point of the Ball-Chambers-Ball article was
not that 70 percent of all addicts once used pot. It is that where there is an illicit drugusing
subculture, marijuana and heroin will be found as mutual components, making the
link more likely; where there is no illicit drug subculture, the progression is unlikely,
because tf
users which has the very highest likelihood of later heroin use. The progression hypothesis
(11 of 24)4/15/2004 1:07:52 AM
The Marijuana Smokers - Chapter 8
holds up best in the very group where the commission gathered data.
Lower-class adolescent slum dwellers are far more likely to come to the attention of
formal legal agencies of social control than the middle-class suburban teenager. For the
latter, informal, nonrecord, nonarrest implementation is more likely than for the former, if
caught. Again, it is a certainty that this progression to heroin is most likely among the
slum dwellers, which the authors themselves state, and least likely at the top of the class
structure, which is distinctly underrepresented in official records. The process of officially
recording an individual's illegal behavior is highly contingent on social class,
neighborhood, race, and education, among other contingencies. Official notice, in fact, is
immersed in the very process the authors are trying to explain. The problem is not with
differentials of law enforcement involvement, as the authors imply (i.e., with the New
York Youth Council files as opposed to incarcerated drug users), but with involvement
with the law at all as opposed to no involvement. In my study only seven respondents
were arrested on marijuana charges, and none was incarcerated.
To reason from this
handful of cases concerning the characteristics of the 200 users in my sample would have
led to erroneous conclusions.
The Narcotics Addiction Control Commission survey at least implied that its validity
was stronger in some groups and weaker in others. Another study7 often cited by law
enforcement officers to support their pot-to-heroin claim was conducted among the
admissions to the Lexington and Fort Worth addiction centers' inmates in 1965. Of the
addicts studied, 70 percent had used marijuana prior to their addiction, that is, had
progressed to the narcotics from cannabis.
This is quoted as definitive proof that the
stepping-stone hypothesis is valid. Giordano, for instance, quotes the Lexington study to
support his antipot propaganda.
Haslip, too, uses the Ball Lexington research report as
support for the progression thesis. Further, both pieces claim that the addict survey
documents the pharmacological "effects" explanation for the transition to heroin.
What does the Ball article really say? Actually, its argument and presentation of fact is
much more subtle than the law officers admit.
The findings do not support the
pharmacological explanation: they refute it. And they do not even document the
progression theory; they qualify it. The main point of the Ball-Chambers-Ball article was
not that 70 percent of all addicts once used pot. It is that where there is an illicit drugusing
subculture, marijuana and heroin will be found as mutual components, making the
link more likely; where there is no illicit drug subculture, the progression is unlikely,
because tf
users which has the very highest likelihood of later heroin use. The progression hypothesis
(11 of 24)4/15/2004 1:07:52 AM
The Marijuana Smokers - Chapter 8
holds up best in the very group where the commission gathered data.
Lower-class adolescent slum dwellers are far more likely to come to the attention of
formal legal agencies of social control than the middle-class suburban teenager. For the
latter, informal, nonrecord, nonarrest implementation is more likely than for the former, if
caught. Again, it is a certainty that this progression to heroin is most likely among the
slum dwellers, which the authors themselves state, and least likely at the top of the class
structure, which is distinctly underrepresented in official records. The process of officially
recording an individual's illegal behavior is highly contingent on social class,
neighborhood, race, and education, among other contingencies. Official notice, in fact, is
immersed in the very process the authors are trying to explain.
The problem is not with
differentials of law enforcement involvement, as the authors imply (i.e., with the New
York Youth Council files as opposed to incarcerated drug users), but with involvement
with the law at all as opposed to no involvement. In my study only seven respondents
were arrested on marijuana charges, and none was incarcerated. To reason from this
handful of cases concerning the characteristics of the 200 users in my sample would have
led to erroneous conclusions.
The Narcotics Addiction Control Commission survey at least implied that its validity
was stronger in some groups and weaker in others. Another study7 often cited by law
enforcement officers to support their pot-to-heroin claim was conducted among the
admissions to the Lexington and Fort Worth addiction centers' inmates in 1965. Of the
addicts studied, 70 percent had used marijuana prior to their addiction, that is, had
progressed to the narcotics from cannabis. This is quoted as definitive proof that the
stepping-stone hypothesis is valid. Giordano, for instance, quotes the Lexington study to
support his antipot propaganda. Haslip, too, uses the Ball Lexington research report as
support for the progression thesis. Further, both pieces claim that the addict survey
documents the pharmacological "effects" explanation for the transition to heroin.
What does the Ball article really say? Actually, its argument and presentation of fact is
much more subtle than the law officers admit. The findings do not support the
pharmacological explanation: they refute it. And they do not even document the
progression theory; they qualify it. The main point of the Ball-Chambers-Ball article was
not that 70 percent of all addicts once used pot. It is that where there is an illicit drugusing
subculture, marijuana and heroin will be found as mutual components, making the
link more likely; where there is no illicit drug subculture, the progression is unlikely,
because t "We have been working from a m39 mother plant that is from 1987. This is absolutely the most powerful strain
I have ever come across. I have purchased & grown many of the newer bragged on strains and still am looking
for something that will even come close to this strain. I'm not saying that this variety is the most potent, just
that in my over 15 yr. search this is what I've found to be the strongest so far."-Clone
"M39 by SSSC was "Basic#5"/Sk#1, but I BELIEVE "Basic#5" was actually NL#5, but SSSC weren't allowed to say
so. You're actually looking for NL#5/Sk#1 which is available from Sensi Seed Bank, they call it "ShivaSkunk".
–MrSoul"We have been working from a m39 mother plant that is from 1987. This is absolutely the most powerful strain
I have ever come across. I have purchased & grown many of the newer bragged on strains and still am looking
for something that will even come close to this strain. I'm not saying that this variety is the most potent, just
that in my over 15 yr. search this is what I've found to be the strongest so far."-Clone
"M39 by SSSC was "Basic5"/Sk1, but I BELIEVE "Basic5" was actually NL5, but SSSC weren't allowed to say
so. You're actually looking for
Use Of Cannabis NL5/Sk1 which is available from Sensi Seed Bank, they call it "ShivaSkunk".
–MrSoul “Princess was obtained from growing out seeds found in buds of Jack Herer that was purchased in Amsterdam at
the "Sensi-Smile" coffee shop, an authorized outlet of Sensi Seed Bank. Thus, it is considered to be an f2
generation Jack Herer. The seeds were found only in the deepest part of the buds indicating that the father was
an unusually early-maturing JH that the growers missed at first.” - MrSoul
acrylic bongs -- 9/4/2010 11:20:41 AM
marijuana
seeds marijuana
This new THC (13)
was
Acrylic completely chracterized 18 by isolation from this mixture Bongs And Bubblers by chromatography
on silver nitrate-silica gel
Friend has been growing supposed BB for a while now, and let me say that the BB from Sensi I grew and
selected a perfect mother (maybe just great luck?), but mine sure is different. Much greener,
pipe
pipe bongs tastier, more
potent, amazing. 8-10 in my opinion. But even Sensi says that 25% are "Special". So I'd advise germing the
whole batch (pack ) of seed as to give yourself a better shot at a primo Mom! Good luck dude. If you never
grew any exotics before, try an easier strain. You really kind of need to Toppingat2weekscannabispineapplechunk know what your doing (selection wise).”
– Bdubs
Strategy in the Synthesis of (-)-t>'- and t>6-THCs and their Metabolites 209
encountered in the synthesis of bol-THC itself as has already been discussed in
the Introduction “Northern lights #2 = originally a Hindu Kush X Thai cross. It was selectively inbred and developed into a stable
almost all Kush type cross that is mostly indica.
”
“I haven't done #5, but # 2 (Oasis) was great.
Most people say that the NL strains have little or no taste or
smell, but my experience with #2 was that it had an oniony, garlicky smell and taste.
The buzz was it.
Couch-lock, but surprisingly psychoactive, given indica's reputation. I don't think you can go wrong with a strain
that highly touted.” - Skunkman“Northern lights 2 = originally a Hindu
Cannabis Seeds Uk Kush X Thai cross. It was selectively inbred and developed into a stable
almost all Kush type cross that is mostly indica.”
“I haven't done 5, but 2 (Oasis) was great. Most people say that the NL strains have little or no taste or
smell, but
Use Of Cannabis my experience with 2 was that it had an oniony, garlicky smell and taste. The buzz was it.
Couch-lock, but surprisingly psychoactive, given indica's reputation. I don't think you can go wrong with a strain
that highly touted.
” - Skunkman

All were grown in 5 gal. black plastic, nursery buckets filled with "Whitney farms premium potting soil" cut by a
third with "Whitney farms cactus mix". Vegged under 1 1000W Sunmaster MH conversion and 2 1000W
HPS...after sexing, reduced to 1 HPS and the Sunmaster in a 4 x 8 x 7 space. Tried Mylar this year for the 1st
time. I don't notice much difference between it and plain flat white walls. Mylar is a real pain to keep clean and
it will be gone as soon as the room is cleared.” - del
"AFOAF grew some (Apollo) recently and got an indica phenotype that finished around 50 days, and a Durban
phenotype that took 60 days.
The indica phenotype is very resinous, clear high. Not racy nor paranoid. Dense buds, low odor.
The Durban phenotype has a stronger high than pure Durban, very clear, very racy, even paranoid. Buds very
fluffy, and they flop over from their own weight. Definitely a creeper phenotype in the gene pool (Durban).
The mom of A-11 is Genius, an F2 of Jack Herer crossed to an unknown male (likely a Durban imho). The dad
of A-11 is Cinderella.
Genius expresses the NL and Skunk side of the gene pool. Cindy expresses the Durban and haze side.
imho, for the A-11 to have 2 phenotypes in the F1, one of which is fluffy, sweet, and floppy like Durban, means
that the Durban gene is in both Apollo and Cindy." - Zorro society than pot itself, the current disposition
on many questions to treat the whole subject as a joke suggests that basic change may be
nearer than we think. As Goode effectively demonstrates, mere evidence, logical
arguments, and the other standard devices that are used to persuade and produce
consensus among reasonable men do not seem to work in this case---perhaps because the
debate is not a real one but only an expression of underlying and unstated motivations,
resentments, or political considerations. Perhaps the case for reform can best be made by
jokes and laughter.
At any rate, it is evident that a great deal of public joking is being done and that the user
of marijuana is not seriously regarded as a genuine criminal. Recent movies, for example,
portray the use of pot as a gag, and at least one movie director has stated that real
marijuana was smoked during the filming. Pot parties, involving the commission of what
the statutes define as heinous crimes, have been presented on the television screen to
(3 of 6)4/15/2004 1:01:30 AM
The Marijuana Smokers
entertain the viewing public. Various popular television programs regularly include pot
jokes. In private conversations such jokes are even more common, and little or no stigma
attaches in many circles to admitting in private that one has smoked or would like to
smoke. Numerous stories float around about policemen, even narcotic agents, who smoke
the weed or have at least tried it. The experiment with alcohol prohibition, it will be
remembered, was also to some extent laughed out of court.
It, of course, is no laughing matter to be busted for a marijuana offense, as the police
sometimes grimly remind us. Nevertheless, the statistical evidence demonstrates that
criticism of the laws, widespread disregard and disrespect for the marijuana laws and their
enforcers, and the sheer impossibility and absurdity of trying to lock up any appreciable
proportion of the users, especially of middle- and upper-class users, has begun seriously to
undermine enforcement morale. In agreement with a large proportion of the public,
enforcement and court officials probably intuitively believe that it is harm to others, not to
self, that makes crime and consequently find it impossible or difficult to think of a
marijuana user as a real criminal. The idea that such persons should be incarcerated in
already overcrowded penal institutions in order to protect society and to cure them of a
personal habit which harms no one else, and possibly not even them, is probably hard for
officials to grasp also. At any rate, there is an enormous gap between the law as written
and the law as actually enforced, and this fact further discredits the system and the
establishment.
Professor Goode does not spell out precisely what changes ought to be made or what
our drug policy ought to be. He is primarily concerned with depicting the way of life and
points of view of the marijuana smoker and with
hydroponique
cafe
“Winner of the Cannabis Cup in 1989. Mostly Indica. All plants have guaranteed high yields, 25% has
something special to it. Usually the lower branches collapse under the weight of the buds. Cash cropper’s
delight. “I grew Sensi Seeds NL#5 and it was one of the best plants I had ever seen. VERY distinctive aroma and taste,
I agree with Skunkman, its like a psychedelic couchlock, the buzz goes for loooong. Plus its one of the best
indoor plants I ever saw, very short and compact, mega-phat top-cola, pretty fast (8 weeks), wont grow much
longer after inducing bloom, excellent flower/leaf ratio. I had good 400 gr./s.m. which I consider nice. Only
drawback I noticed was you better watch the air humidity, they have a tendency to catch bud rot, and the colas
are just too fat and sticky so the air won’t go into. But when you keep moisture down to max. 50% rh. you
should do well. To my experience they are true-breeding, but on the other hand I heard that too much
inbreeding out of a small number of species might cause some problems and show up some indica aspects
you may not want to have. I heard of NL#5 F2 that smelled and tasted like shit and had a very dull buzz.” -
huzzit
"(For multiple sclerosis) my friend is currently using a pure indica (NL#5) with good results..." - pot newz Lindgren, K
“After years of heartfelt requests for a Northern Lights strain, Sagarmatha has engineered a superior version of
the NL legend.
NL#9 delivers the finest qualities expected from that variety: a short plant with a voracious
stone and minimal smell. The flowering time is acceptable and fat chunky nugs can be expected.
Early Girl Weed Pics Fantastic for
gardens where smell is an unfavorable factor. Also fine for persons who desire a heavy, lethargic stone.“After years of heartfelt requests for a Northern Lights strain, Sagarmatha has engineered a superior version of
the NL legend. NL9 delivers the finest qualities expected from that variety: a short plant with a voracious
stone and minimal smell. The flowering time is acceptable and fat chunky nugs can be expected. Fantastic for
gardens where smell is
Romulan Weed
an unfavorable factor. Also
early girl cannabis
fine for
Bubblers And Bongs persons who desire a heavy, lethargic stone.
, 19, 1328
(1976) While I'm not going to say that Big Bud isn't a good strain, it's not as magical as many people seem to think.
The main problem is the name, Big Bud, everyone expects massive buds. They are big, but not significantly
larger than many other top strains. The potency is good but not knock you off your feet good. There is huge
variations from plant to plant, some are killer and deserving of some of the legends, but the majority are just
typical(of high quality strains). Overall, a good plant as long as you don't expect miracles. I just finished a
bowl of it myself.